Roy V (16/07/2009)
M Perrott (16/07/2009)
Between 0215 hours and 0230 hours this morning, I received no less than 4 anonymous calls to my home number. Talk about tempting fate !!
Take for example Peter Clatworthy. His strong views are not my cup of tea, but at every masonic forum he has joined certain individuals have followed him, hounded him and made sure he leaves quickly.
Perish the thought that I am attempting to prolong this type of discussion, but do these anonymous people speak? If so, you could be, with the help of the police you claim to have involved, record and trace the callers. In which case, job done.
They always speak, and ask for me by name "Brother Perrott" if I do not answer the phone. I usually don't, someone else does. If I do answer the phone second or third calling, the line goes dead. Number withheld. The Police will only take it further if the voice is threatening or abusive. It is sometimes male, sometimes female but never abusive or aggressive. The Police are involved in the other matters.
However, if there is merely a ringing which proves to be a dead line when it is picked up, and the number is witheld, that is no different from the erstwhile cold calls to my own home number, and are caused by call centres dialling several numbers at once, and speaking only to the first to answer. This can be prevented by registering with the TPS.
Thanks for that, I work with offshore and inland callcentres for my job, I know the drill. The patterns do not conform, and BT have confirmed that and that the callers are UK based.. They will not disclose which numbers are calling, at least to me.
However, if the time of day is significant, maybe there are persons in the antipodes who have serious issues with you - in which case, surely international numbers can still be traced by the authorities.
The time of day is only significant due to the nuisance factor.
With reference to Grand Secretary Clatworthy, any man who acts in Eastenders has a lot to answer for! But notwithstanding the attacks on him by the insidious DI supporters, he has not run away, but reigns supreme as the face of a certain form of Freemasonry, albeit imitating a loon at times, sometimes referring to "normal" FM as a state of fact; but mostly we are discarded as "pretend" Masons, not of his world.
No-one has hounded him away as far as I have seen, and they are pretty vicious individuals on that forum.
DI Forum? Not mentioned that place. It was not DI forumites that were attacking him, it was "masons". Some would say you get back what you give. In his case, I think his treatment was unjust. But then who am I?;)
Edit: Roy, you have taken my words out of context also. I have said all along I do not hold any brief for that particular GL, Peter Cltworthy or his views. In fact I disagree with virtually everything he stands for. The point of mentioning him was on the level of tolerance and what happens to those that fall foul of the masonic forum clique "elite".