The Freemason Forum



Class system

Posted By WantToLearn 31/08/2010 10:07:08
Add to Favorites0
Author Message
WantToLearn
 Posted 31/08/2010 10:07:08
Apprentice

Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 15/02/2011 22:07:56
Posts: 61, Visits: 115
101
Hi guys
Really pleased i found this forum. A great sense of community going on here.
Im being initiated later this year and cant wait!
Read a comment on here last night thats got me thinking...
The comment pretty much said that the craft over here in the uk has been hijacked by the upper classes and only the knights dukes lords etc and other "old money" are the only ones that can truly aspire to the upper reaches of the craft... Is this true?
All the best



dp
 Posted 31/08/2010 10:51:13
Master

Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 08/01/2012 18:59:22
Posts: 1,082, Visits: 3,065
WantToLearn (31/08/2010)
Hi guys
Really pleased i found this forum. A great sense of community going on here.
Im being initiated later this year and cant wait!
Read a comment on here last night thats got me thinking...
The comment pretty much said that the craft over here in the uk has been hijacked by the upper classes and only the knights dukes lords etc and other "old money" are the only ones that can truly aspire to the upper reaches of the craft... Is this true?
All the best


Hello and welcome to the forum :)

Perhaps you could quote the thread so we could have a read and come back to you in context?
Mike Martin
 Posted 31/08/2010 11:10:11
Past Master

Past Master - (2,785 reputation)

Group: Administrator
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 2,322, Visits: 11,823
I can't remember that thread either, which one is it?

 Mike
Mersey Lodge No. 5434 Website
The Freemasons'''' Grand Charity Website
See my BALLS here
WantToLearn
 Posted 31/08/2010 11:32:09
Apprentice

Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 15/02/2011 22:07:56
Posts: 61, Visits: 115
101
Hi guys sorry heres the quote and link

multisync (19/08/2010)
Janus (19/08/2010)
Thanks for the link there.

Multisync; your comment pussles me a bit, could you please elaborate.


Crumbs we'd be here all day but from my perspective UGLE Freemasonry is based on an elaborate conscious and sub conscious hierarchy often based on class.

We all have to stand up and clap the PGM

We salute up never down

Gold braid and different coloured aprons

We toast the great and the good

Stewards often have to wait on people hand and foot during meals

GM isusually Royalty these days and has been for a long time..

etc etc

We areruled byasystem based on class(occasionally fortune has a small part to play) but being a Knight , Lord Duke or Prince will almost certainly g.tee Grand Rank.

We are neverever even remotely equal in any way shape or form. Those that believe we are are deluding themselves with all the 'meet on the level' stuff..It's a sop, I have heard that In some Provinces an accompanying officer is expected to chauffeur the PGM -or whatever- from his home, to the Lodge and back to his home. No matter where in the Province those might be.(at his own expense!)

I'm not remotely bitter or bothered by all this, just I don't believe we are all equal or that was ever the intention once the 'upper classes' hijacked modern Freemasonry and made it their own..

No point going on and I'm sure there are many more obvious one's but that's how it is and so mote it be..;)


http://www.thefreemason.com/community/Topic23254-5-2.aspx?Highlight=Vip



Mike Martin
 Posted 31/08/2010 11:47:11
Past Master

Past Master - (2,785 reputation)

Group: Administrator
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 2,322, Visits: 11,823
So basically reading the original comment properly shows that it doesn't actually say what you say it says so the question seems a little pointless.

However, it is not a fact that people who have a rank or fortune can get to the top of Freemasonry it is just someone's perception.

 Mike
Mersey Lodge No. 5434 Website
The Freemasons'''' Grand Charity Website
See my BALLS here
dp
 Posted 31/08/2010 12:13:05
Master

Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 08/01/2012 18:59:22
Posts: 1,082, Visits: 3,065
Thanks for pasting the original text.

I would disagree that the "top" jobs are reserved for people with title but what I would say is that the more involved one gets with Freemasonry and the "higher" up one goes the more is required in terms of both time and cost.

For example I live in the Canary Islands and I travel regularly on Masonic business between the Canary Islands as well as to the Mainland (Spain) and also to the UK. I am fortunate to be in a position where I can afford both the time and cost to do this.

The result is that I am in a number of orders and hold rank in a number of orders that my Brethren do not. I am not a better man or Mason for this and given the opportunity I am sure that a lot of my Brethren would commit the same amount of time (and by default cash) to Masonry as I do.

So, a lot of the "higher" positions within Masonry are held by people who are retired, semi retired or business owners (MD's whatever) and have a lot of cash to pay for all the travelling and regalia. This is a filter all of it's own.

No nepotism involved.
WantToLearn
 Posted 31/08/2010 12:21:13
Apprentice

Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 15/02/2011 22:07:56
Posts: 61, Visits: 115
101
Thank you for your reply. From rereading the original post youre correct my question isnt the same at all.. Lol sorry. I originally read it last night and slept on it. Woke up and posted my question. If you want to delete this thread, please go ahead.

Looking forward to calling you all my brothers. Regards and thank you for easing my concerns.



WantToLearn
 Posted 31/08/2010 12:26:02
Apprentice

Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)Apprentice - (101 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 15/02/2011 22:07:56
Posts: 61, Visits: 115
101
dp (31/08/2010)
Thanks for pasting the original text.

I would disagree that the "top" jobs are reserved for people with title but what I would say is that the more involved one gets with Freemasonry and the "higher" up one goes the more is required in terms of both time and cost.

For example I live in the Canary Islands and I travel regularly on Masonic business between the Canary Islands as well as to the Mainland (Spain) and also to the UK. I am fortunate to be in a position where I can afford both the time and cost to do this.

The result is that I am in a number of orders and hold rank in a number of orders that my Brethren do not. I am not a better man or Mason for this and given the opportunity I am sure that a lot of my Brethren would commit the same amount of time (and by default cash) to Masonry as I do.

So, a lot of the "higher" positions within Masonry are held by people who are retired, semi retired or business owners (MD's whatever) and have a lot of cash to pay for all the travelling and regalia. This is a filter all of it's own.

No nepotism involved.


Thank you for the excellent reply. Makes sense.



Mike Martin
 Posted 31/08/2010 12:28:52
Past Master

Past Master - (2,785 reputation)

Group: Administrator
Last Active: 2 hours ago
Posts: 2,322, Visits: 11,823
No there's no need to delete it. It's Ok there are bound to be other people that think that's how it is.

 Mike
Mersey Lodge No. 5434 Website
The Freemasons'''' Grand Charity Website
See my BALLS here
dp
 Posted 31/08/2010 15:14:53
Master

Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)Master - (1,259 reputation)

Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 08/01/2012 18:59:22
Posts: 1,082, Visits: 3,065
Thanks,

I would just like to add that there is no requirement in Freemasonry to progress farther than you are comfortable with.

Let's take two hypothetical Brothers.

Brother one has been in the Craft for 25 years and is out at a meeting every week and sometimes more. He is in every side order imaginable and holds senior rank in most of them. He is also a very senior ranking member in Craft Freemasonry and holds Grand Rank.

Brother two has also been in the Craft for 25 years. He attends every meeting of his Mother Lodge and regularly visits other Lodges. He however decided that it would be too much for him to go through all the offices and remains a Master Mason.

The two are in my, and any true Masons eyes equal. The important thing is that once you join you enjoy your Freemasonry and if you end up as Brother one or Brother two the only aim is to be happy and to learn what you wish at your own pace.

Similar Topics

Expand / Collapse

Back To Top