|
M Perrott
|
Posted 24/11/2009 00:08:17
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 21/12/2011 00:19:49
Posts: 339,
Visits: 2,530
|
multisync (23/11/2009)
Alan Campbell (23/11/2009) Multisync, if better education, higher profile, and an explanation of what we are about is NOT the answer, what do you think the answer is in regards to better education of the public and stopping dwindling numbers.The solution is from within. There is little point in pouring them in the top if they are just falling out the bottom..Check the figures for drop out within the Craft. That is where the real problem lies. Solve this and the dwindling numbers solves itself..... Part of the solution may be realising where the real problem is. And then writing it out like you have. Nice one. With the old idea that you can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink, looking from a slightly different angle: If a person is not already "prepared" to join, no amount of posters, walk bys and publicity campaigns will capture their imagination. Chances are, in the wrong frame of mind, they will have no idea what they are looking at. And not even a press gang will change that.
|
|
|
|
|
chestnut
|
Posted 24/11/2009 09:15:44
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10 hours ago
Posts: 1,022,
Visits: 5,566
|
Multisync when you talk about the change coming from within you are correct. The within can be from the individual, the Lodges and the institution.
The individual needs to act as a FM in his dealings with the world at large. Showing the benefits of our ancient and honourable institution.
The Lodges need to work more on the Brotherley Love of their members. It is very simple, when a Brother does not attend and send no apology does the Almoner phone him to see if he is Ok and to tell him he was missed. If a Brother sends apologies for two meetings is he likewise phoned. Would this simple act not help to make a Brother feel valued? The Mentoring Scheme will be a big plus if administered correctly in the Lodge. Having attended a workshop last night I was pleased at the thoroughness of the material and the enthusiasm of the Mentors. However I was saddened to hear that a Lodge will give the Mentor post to the outgoing IPM each year, how this will ever be for the good of the Lodge and not the individual is beyond me.
At the meeting yesterday the APGM concerned stated that there was a 'wind of change blowing through GL'. There is concern over retention and perception of FM and this is looking to be addressed.
Perhaps then all the elements are there it is up to us how we develop ourselves and influence others.
David
|
|
|
|
|
lauderdale
|
Posted 24/11/2009 09:31:55
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10/07/2011 06:43:06
Posts: 2,136,
Visits: 4,278
|
David, was that one Lodge only that as a matter of its policy has decided to give the outgoing IPM of that year the Office of Mentor or is this to be the practice in all UGLE Lodges, at least in that Province? I would have thought that of all Offices that of Lodge Mentor should be held by a Brother for a number of years and should be given to someone who by knowledge and personality is suited to the task, in effect a "People Person" rather than being fillled by "buggins' turn".
|
|
|
|
|
chestnut
|
Posted 24/11/2009 11:42:00
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10 hours ago
Posts: 1,022,
Visits: 5,566
|
Steve it was one Lodge and certainly the Provinces and GL attitude is that it is an office to be held for a few years for it to be effective.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Keith
|
Posted 24/11/2009 21:30:54
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 29/01/2012 04:48:25
Posts: 411,
Visits: 1,041
|
This is hardly a job for one person even if for a few years. Surely it is the responsibility of every PM to be a mentor to at least one 'younger' Brother! It is not just a 'job' but the development of a relationship of sorts.
Keith
PM. Waimarino 175
Kaimanawa 426
Waikato Lodge of Research 445
Taupo, New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
lauderdale
|
Posted 24/11/2009 22:39:04
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10/07/2011 06:43:06
Posts: 2,136,
Visits: 4,278
|
In theory you are correct Bro Keith but as with most things it is horses for courses. The mentor has to be a "people person" as I have said and needs to have "plenty of Job's patience too" . Some Brethren may be very good Masons but to be able to take a new Brother under their wings. It's a bit like Almoner, not an Office I could ever do, I don't have the right mind-set.I do agree that it needs more than one Brother to undertake this important task in a large Lodge.
|
|
|
|
|
chestnut
|
Posted 25/11/2009 06:53:32
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10 hours ago
Posts: 1,022,
Visits: 5,566
|
I think there is some confusion here.
Lets take the Almoner as an example. He is appointed by the Lodge to report regarding those Brethren and families who are in distress. However it is all the brethern who feed him information and assist as they can.
The Lodge Mentor is the same. He coordinates the scheme in the Lodge and will have as many brethren as he sees fit to assist. The mentoring is not a one man job but inevitably there is one man who oversees it.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Martin
|
Posted 31/12/2009 11:23:44
|
Excellent Master
Group: Administrator
Last Active: 36 minutes ago
Posts: 2,321,
Visits: 11,820
|
As it's relevent to the subject, here is a response I posted to the UKMasonlist recently(ish) regarding the Televison exposure Freemasonry has had recently:Brethren all,
This response is not aimed at anyone in particular but I hope will help many to understand why we need to get rid of our sometimes overly secretive side. I write as a Freemason of 15 years standing but more importantly as someone who started his Masonic journey on the other side of the fence. My first ever contact with Freemasonry, 25 years ago, was a book called "The Brotherhood" by a miscreant named Stephen Knight, you see I am the first Freemason in my family. The first few years of my travels were spent believing that the Masons were corrupt and involved in many conspiracies. The difference with me and the "Internet generation" was that I liked to read for myself and as I read more books on Freemasonry I realised my first impressions were wrong.
Freemasonry has long been a target for conspiracy theorists, most notably the Abbe Barruel (Jesuit Priest) and John Robison (ex-Mason) in the 1790s and Leo Taxil (who can be personally credited with the Catholic Church's opposition to us) in 1890s. There was also a rash of exposures and conspiracy laden tales during the 20th Century most notable of these being the Rev. Walton Hannah's "Darkness Visible" (1953) and Stephen Knight's “Jack the Ripper, the Final Solution” (1976) and "The Brotherhood" (1984). This has never really done Freemasonry much damage as these were in the form of books which did not get much circulation at the time and so had little effect in shaping the public's opinion of the Craft. Therefore we didn't need to address them.
However, what we all need to take account of now is the development, over the last 20 years, of the Internet. In 2009, nearly every home has a PC with the majority giving access to the most wonderful development in information communication since William Caxton’s printing press. However with the rise of it, these Authors are now bandied about along with others who although not anti-Masons also weren't actually Freemasons either but wrote loads of mystic mumbo jumbo about Freemasonry (ie Manly Palmer Hall and WC Heckethorn just to mention two). Today’s conspiracists scour these old books, misquoting and removing words from their original context, promoting the Authors to the position of “Masonic Authority” then building websites around them that mislead the Public and the Media about Freemasonry. Hundreds and even thousands of people visit these sites day in and day out and come away half believing that we are trying to take over the world (NWO) or are the new Illuminati or, even worse, worship the devil in our Lodges.
I wonder how many of the readers here remember or are even aware of the fact that in 1994 the Home Affairs Select Committee (this was here in England not Germany in the 1940s) carried out a public investigation, lasting nearly 2 years, based on the writings of Stephen Knight and his successor Martin Short (he actually appeared as an "expert witness") into the influence of Freemasonry in the Police and Judiciary. I do because I was busy writing to the Home Secretary through my MP decrying such a blatant desecration of one of this countries oldest institutions. This investigation resulted (apart from the Media circus) in the fact that today when joining several professions you are required to disclose whether you are a Mason or not, no other groups just Freemasons.
I also wonder how many Freemasons bother to look into how long our "secrecy" has actually been around? I know I have and have seen hundreds of photographs and watched old newsreels from the 1920s and 30s showing Masons proudly processing in town centres, carrying out Cornerstone Ceremonies and wearing regalia in public. It was in the early 1940s that our secrecy appeared in response to events that were occurring across Europe.
In this climate those who think about these things have realised that we have to do away with this artificial secrecy, it is not helping the Craft. Another thing is that these efforts are not aimed at convincing the Conspiracy Theorists that they are stupid (an impossible task, I know I've personally been trying for more than 15 years) but to stop the Public falling victim to these fantastic tales of Masonic wrongdoings. Just think about it, how can any man come to the Order "having formed a favourable opinion of it" if they don't know who we are and what we do and have only ever seen the material I've mentioned above?
I am very proud to be a Freemason and people who know me, even only vaguely, know that I am a member so I know that my own actions in life (hopefully) reflect honour on the Craft. So I say these little television snippets are long overdue and most welcome. It is time for Freemasonry in Britain to resume its former place as a pillar of Society and to be recognised as such by non-Masons.
Just my tuppence worth Brethren. .
 MikeMersey Lodge No. 5434 WebsiteThe Freemasons'''' Grand Charity WebsiteSee my BALLS here
|
|
|
|
|
lauderdale
|
Posted 31/12/2009 12:16:27
|
|
Group: Forum Member
Last Active: 10/07/2011 06:43:06
Posts: 2,136,
Visits: 4,278
|
I find myself in agreement with much of what you have posted above Bro Mike. It would be nice if the Powers that Be where you work took notice and acted upon it.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Martin
|
Posted 31/12/2009 12:44:46
|
Excellent Master
Group: Administrator
Last Active: 36 minutes ago
Posts: 2,321,
Visits: 11,820
|
Lauderdale (31/12/2009) It would be nice if the Powers that Be where you work took notice and acted upon it.My Grand Lodge has done as much as is possible to encourage its members to throw away any left-overs from the post war years, it is now up to individual members to just do it. Our Pro Grand Master's Address from the December Quarterly Communications http://www.ugle.org.uk/news-events-page/latest-pro-grand-masters-address/ included these words: In October I attended the 150th Anniversary celebrations of our District of South Island New Zealand. I was accompanied by the Grand Secretary and Very Worshipful Brother Andrew Wigram acting as Grand Director of Ceremonies. South and North Island are our furthest Districts and the successful visit was another example of our commitment to our Districts, however far from London they may be. I highlight two events whilst we were there. The first was a march, in full regalia and with the Provincial and individual Lodge banners flying, from Christchurch Cathedral to the Canterbury Provincial Council Buildings where the celebration ceremony was being held. It was a magnificent sight which was much enjoyed by both the Brethren and the local burghers of Christchurch, albeit some having a mildly surprised look on their faces. The march lasted about 15 minutes and took us past a well known local hostelry called the Holy Grail. I am glad to say that we did not deviate. The second was a service in the Cathedral – again in full regalia. The Cathedral was packed with Brethren and their families as well as many members of the regular congregation. I was asked to read the Gospel and the Dean gave an excellent – and very supportive – sermon, his father and 3 brothers all having been Masons. It was a very happy time and I am delighted that the District is in such good heart. Brethren, those of you who were present in Grand Chapter last month would have heard my statement to the English Craft in general relating to the announcement by the Justice Secretary that judges and other members of the judicial system no longer have to declare that they are Freemasons. The President of the Board today has given a more detailed explanation of the events leading up to this change and of the success that has been achieved in combating discrimination in the Government, Local Authorities and other parts of the public sector. Brethren, we are all pleased that at last - what we have always seen to be an injustice – is being remedied and that, hopefully, we will no longer be subjected to this unfair discrimination. However I make no apology for stressing again that this does not mean that there is no need for you to disclose that you are Freemasons. You should continue to use common sense and disclose your membership whenever it is appropriate to do so. In any cases of doubt you should err on the side of disclosure, and we should all show our pride in being a member of our Order.
 MikeMersey Lodge No. 5434 WebsiteThe Freemasons'''' Grand Charity WebsiteSee my BALLS here
|
|
|
|